John represented an insurance carrier and gained judgment of non-coverage for a vehicle that was owned by a car dealership and taken by an employee of the car dealership without permission, resulting in a significant vehicle accident with multiple injuries. The court determined there was no coverage under the various provisions of the insurance policy, including specifically that the dealership vehicle did not constitute a "temporary substitute vehicle."
Litigation Successes
Declaratory Judgment - Stolen Vehicle from Car Dealership

Litigation Success
Dog Bite - Summary Judgment
Our office represented a dog owner who invited the injured person into their home where several dogs were present. The injured person claimed one of...
read moreAdams County – Summary Judgment – Carbon Monoxide/ Premises Liability
Abigail defended the landlord/owner of a house rented to an unmarried couple with two children. During the night, an alleged carbon monoxide...
read more